Mockphine keeps frontend and QA moving when backends are unstable. It lets teams mock blocked endpoints, pass through ready ones, and prove exactly what served each response; control unmatched routes with strict 404 or fallback passthrough; and inspect served-by source, status, duration, headers, and bodies in Live View. Deterministic matching plus delay/failure simulation helps catch integration bugs before release.
Hey Product Hunt! I'm Cuong, maker of Mockphine. I built this after too many releases where frontend and QA were blocked by unstable or incomplete backend APIs. Most workflows forced a bad tradeoff: fully mocked (fast but unrealistic) or fully staging (real but flaky). I started with a tiny local mock server, then evolved it with feedback into: π Route-level modes: Mock / Passthrough / Disabled π Unmatched-route fallback control: strict 404 or passthrough π Live View that shows served-by source
Congratulations! The βfully mocked vs. fully stagingβ dilemma is one of those chronic engineering tax problems that never quite makes it onto the roadmap because it feels like infrastructure debt rather than a feature. Does Mockphine support response templating? E.g., can I define dynamic mock responses based on request parameters, or is it static fixture-based for now?
Hi Cuong, really smart design on the route-level mock/passthrough modes β I've hit exactly this problem before. I'm a full-stack engineer (Next.js, TypeScript, Node.js) and would love to help build Mockphine further. Is there a way to reach you?