The personality test for modern teams
There’s no “I” in team, so why are we still using individual personality tests from the 1950s in the modern workplace? TeamDynamics captures the realities of how teams get work done today, with insights to help you build your team and manage it better.
Awesome product idea! Why hasn't somebody done this before?? It's such a great tool for teams to use. I'm excited to try it out. Congrats on the launch!
Very cool product!! Makes a lot of sense to actually measure the team instead of doing individual tests and just jamming them together as an afterthought. Congrats on the launch!!
Just tried this out, results seemed pretty spot on for me. Will give it a try with my team; we have our Q1 retreat coming up so will get the team to complete it during our “ways of working” sesh. Any types of teams you’re seeing more traction with? And I know a criticism of things like MBTI is that your type changes as you age… how consistent are the results over time?
Hey Product Hunters! 👋 A few of us got together to build a tool to help teams understand, and improve, how they communicate and collaborate to get stuff done 🧑💻🛠️🚀. It’s called TeamDynamics ! 💡 We’ve always found individual personality tests (MBTI, Enneagram, Big Five, etc.) useful for understanding ourselves and our 1:1 interactions with others (even if they might not be 100% scientific). But they don't capture the 1:N / N:1 / N:N dynamics that emerge when you mix together a bunch of personali
Amazing idea! Team building is always something we need to strive to achieve and this tool can definitely help. Do you think that in the future it can evolve into (or have a version of) a type of whole company dynamics review? Since then I guess also the questions and criteria would be a bit different.
The scores reflect launch-period engagement. Historical data is preserved and doesn't change retroactively. The build date at the bottom shows when the index was last refreshed.
Check the similar products section on this page, or browse the category pages linked in the tags above. Each category page shows all products for a given year, sorted by engagement.
A measure of community engagement at launch. Higher means more people noticed and interacted with the product. It's a traction signal, not a quality rating.
Discussion threads divided by interest score. Above 0.30 is strong. Below 0.15 suggests the product got clicks but not conversation.