Two ways to evaluate Aikido Security against Probo: interest score (who noticed) and engagement ratio (who cared). The comparison below covers both, plus category overlap.
Side-by-side comparison of Aikido Security and Probo based on community engagement data.
Secure everything you build, host, and run.
Compliance for Startups to get SOC2/ISO27001/HIPAA in a week
Two ways to evaluate Aikido Security against Probo: interest score (who noticed) and engagement ratio (who cared). The comparison below covers both, plus category overlap.
| Category | Aikido Security | Probo |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence | - | Yes |
| Developer Tools | Yes | - |
| Open Source | - | Yes |
| Security | Yes | Yes |
| Software Engineering | Yes | - |
Hey Product Hunt! 👋 Hov here, part of the Aikido Security team. For years we’ve felt the pain of security tools that were slow, noisy, overpriced, and confusing. So we set out to build the tool we always wished existed — fast, clear, and actually helping developers fix real issues while cutting thro...
Great product, if I do so say myself. 👌
We integrated Aikido into our security platform, and the setup was incredibly fast. Connected our GitHub repo, added domain monitoring, and had our first SAST and DAST scan results within minutes. The free tier is genuinely generous, and the noise reduction on findings is a game changer compared to ...
Hey Product Hunt! 👋 Antoine & Bryan here, founders of Probo - the open source compliance platform. Why we built Probo Compliance today is a still a pain: ❌ Poor guidance ❌ One-size-fit-all checklists ❌ Time consuming ❌ Vendor lock-in We knew there had to be a founder-friendly way. So we bu...
Really like how Probo makes compliance less of a headache. It’s one of those things every company needs but few enjoy doing. Would love to know how well it’s working in helping teams actually get certified and stay compliant over time.
@antoine_bouchardy Congrats on the launch, Antoine and team! Probo's approach to simplifying compliance is impressive. As someone who curates newsletters for founders and small business owners, I know how challenging compliance can be for startups. If you're interested, I'd be happy to feature Probo...
Aikido Security leads on raw interest score. Aikido Security leads on engagement ratio. Aikido Security leads on both metrics. That doesn't happen often.
These products share 1 categories: Security. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Aikido Security is also tagged in Developer Tools, Software Engineering, which Probo isn't. That suggests Aikido Security positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Probo has unique category tags in Artificial Intelligence, Open Source. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Aikido Security launched Sep 2025. Probo launched May 2025. Both launched the same year, meaning they faced similar market conditions and competition levels.
Pick Aikido Security if you want the product with the larger community behind it; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you need something that also covers Developer Tools.
Pick Probo if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; you need something that also covers Open Source.
Aikido Security: Your central code, cloud, and runtime security platform. Fix vulnerabilities automatically with AI AutoFix and AutoTriage. Cut false positives by 85%. Security is an everyone problem. So get security done, and get devs back to building.
Probo: Probo is an open-source platform for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and more. If you don't want to lose time doing it, we provide a white-glove service to run everything for you and let you focus on your business. Open-source, transparent, and stress-free.
These products also compete in the Security category:
Sprinto Trust Center — Your single secure shareable compliance hub (Interest: 455, Engagement: 0.13)
Stop Copycats — Take down a copycat in seconds (Interest: 416, Engagement: 0.14)
Golf — The enterprise firewall for MCP providers (Interest: 389, Engagement: 0.15)
DepsHub — Update dependencies using AI (Interest: 360, Engagement: 0.21)
Astra API Security Platform — Discover, Scan, and Secure every API at scale (Interest: 355, Engagement: 0.21)
Opengrep — The open source code security engine (Interest: 345, Engagement: 0.06)
Either the product didn't meet our engagement threshold, or it doesn't share enough category tags with the other product to generate a meaningful comparison. We'd rather show no comparison than a misleading one.
Each product's data reflects its launch period. The comparison shows both products' engagement metrics from when they launched. The build date at the bottom of the page shows when the index was last refreshed.
Not yet. Current comparisons use launch-period data only. Post-launch tracking is on our roadmap.
Generally, yes. Engagement ratio is hard to fake. A product can generate artificial interest, but sustained discussion threads require people who actually used the product and had something to say about it.
Automatically. We compare products that share at least one category and have similar interest scores. Products too far apart in traction don't make for useful comparisons.
No. Interest is launch-day attention. Engagement ratio is a better quality signal. The product with more discussions per interest point usually has stronger product-market fit.