The Clueso vs Findr question comes up often in SaaS circles. Here's what the launch data says. No opinions from us, just metrics and category overlap.
Side-by-side comparison of Clueso and Findr based on community engagement data.
Create stunning product videos in minutes with AI
Search all your apps, at once
The Clueso vs Findr question comes up often in SaaS circles. Here's what the launch data says. No opinions from us, just metrics and category overlap.
| Category | Clueso | Findr |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
| Productivity | - | Yes |
| SaaS | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | - |
Hey Product Hunt Community! 👋 I'm Neel, co-founder of Clueso, and I'm really excited to launch Clueso for the first time on PH! Why did we build Clueso? Many of us build amazing products but struggle to effectively demo them, or educate our users about them. We faced this problem first-hand at our p...
i was literally looking for an app like that,thats awesome ngl
Wow, amazing product! I don’t know how I missed this! Congrats!
Hello PH community 👋, I’m really excited to introduce you to Findr — a game-changing search tool. Think of it as your organization's internal Google. It lets you search across all your apps from just one search bar. Why Findr? 🤔 In today’s digital world, we’re juggling more apps than ever - emails i...
Congrats on your recent launch @nishkarsh_srivastava and @utkarsh_agarwal6. It's exciting to see new products like Findr that aims to streamline work efficiency.
Findr is an absolute gem for discovering the right tools quickly. Clean UI and super relevant results every time.
Clueso leads on raw interest score. Findr leads on engagement ratio. That split is worth paying attention to. Clueso attracted more initial eyeballs, but Findr's audience engaged deeper. For most buyers, engagement ratio is the better signal.
These products share 2 categories: Artificial Intelligence, SaaS. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Clueso is also tagged in Video, which Findr isn't. That suggests Clueso positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Findr has unique category tags in Productivity. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Clueso launched Jul 2025. Findr launched Jan 2024. Findr is the veteran here. Clueso entered later, with the benefit of watching what worked and what didn't in the category.
Pick Clueso if you want the product with the larger community behind it; you prefer newer tools with fresher tech; you need something that also covers Video.
Pick Findr if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you value stability and a longer track record; you need something that also covers Productivity.
Clueso: Clueso is the fastest and easiest way to create stunning product videos. It converts raw screen recordings into studio-quality videos and step-by-step articles in minutes. No editing or design skills needed.
Findr: We’re juggling with more apps than ever. Information is scattered everywhere - from links in slack to countless emails in Gmail. Findr lets you search across Slack, Notion Gmail, and all your favourite apps from a single place. One search for all your apps.
These products also compete in the Artificial Intelligence, SaaS categories:
Competitor Analysis — Know your rivals, win your market. (Interest: 804, Engagement: 0.18)
Supabase AI Assistant [LW24] — Idea to Postgres database (Interest: 759, Engagement: 0.13)
ToyPal — An AI powered device and app that brings soft toys to life (Interest: 734, Engagement: 0.23)
Freepik AI Video Upscaler — Upscale videos up to 4K in one click (Interest: 529, Engagement: 0.04)
LLM Stats — Compare API models by benchmarks, cost & capabilities (Interest: 313, Engagement: 0.05)
DreamFlow — Turn map screenshots into aerial cinematic videos with Veo3 (Interest: 304, Engagement: 0.08)
Not yet. Current comparisons use launch-period data only. Post-launch tracking is on our roadmap.
Generally, yes. Engagement ratio is hard to fake. A product can generate artificial interest, but sustained discussion threads require people who actually used the product and had something to say about it.
Automatically. We compare products that share at least one category and have similar interest scores. Products too far apart in traction don't make for useful comparisons.
No. Interest is launch-day attention. Engagement ratio is a better quality signal. The product with more discussions per interest point usually has stronger product-market fit.
How directly these products compete. Three or more shared categories means they're going after the same user. One shared category means they approach the space from different angles. Zero overlap and they probably shouldn't be compared.
Comparisons are generated automatically when two products have enough data overlap. If the pair you want isn't here, the products might be in different categories or too far apart in engagement.