The Supergrid by Depict vs Layouts.dev question comes up often in Web Design circles. Here's what the launch data says. No opinions from us, just metrics and category overlap.
Side-by-side comparison of Supergrid by Depict and Layouts.dev based on community engagement data.
Scroll-stopping Shopify storefronts in seconds
A notebook for building interfaces with Tailwind & shadcn/UI
The Supergrid by Depict vs Layouts.dev question comes up often in Web Design circles. Here's what the launch data says. No opinions from us, just metrics and category overlap.
| Category | Supergrid by Depict | Layouts.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | - |
| Design Tools | - | Yes |
| Developer Tools | - | Yes |
| Development | - | Yes |
| E-Commerce | Yes | - |
| Web Design | Yes | Yes |
Hey Product Hunters! ๐ Iโm John, CEO of Depict. Iโm excited to launch Supergrid for ecomm stores - a hyper-creative way to design editorial & intelligent collection grids. Why? ๐ฉธ Over 80% of shoppers interact with collection grids - but the majority of ecomm stores display static, boring 4x4 gri...
Scroll-stopping storefronts in seconds? ๐๏ธโก Supergrid by Depict sounds like a power tool for Shopify brands. Visuals sellโthis could seriously boost conversions! ๐ฏ๐ผ๏ธ
Iโve built software for e-commerce merchants and run my own e-commerce store, so I know the struggle of making your website actually look good (mine still don't look very good haha)...... A friend mentioned Supergrid to me this morning.... very very cool. Iโve spent way too many hours trying to make...
๐ Hey ProductHunt! I'm Severin, co-founder of Layouts.dev. Layouts.dev is a notebook-style editor designed for quickly building UIs using Tailwind. About a year ago, my co-founder Alex (a designer) and I started working on Layouts. We realized that moving from Figma to code was slowing down our iter...
Now if you build a Tooljet style UI to generate the DSL you will REALLY be onto something.
I wonder if thereโs a potential to turn this into a website builder, similar to how Wordpress utilizes Gutenberg. This is a great idea.
Supergrid by Depict leads on raw interest score. Supergrid by Depict leads on engagement ratio. Supergrid by Depict leads on both metrics. That doesn't happen often.
These products share 1 categories: Web Design. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Supergrid by Depict is also tagged in Artificial Intelligence, E-Commerce, which Layouts.dev isn't. That suggests Supergrid by Depict positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Layouts.dev has unique category tags in Design Tools, Developer Tools, Development. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Supergrid by Depict launched Mar 2025. Layouts.dev launched Oct 2024. Layouts.dev is the veteran here. Supergrid by Depict entered later, with the benefit of watching what worked and what didn't in the category.
Supergrid by Depict has a 0.21 engagement ratio (average), based on 161 discussion threads across 756 interest points. Middle of the pack for Web Design. Enough discussion to suggest real usage, but not the kind of buzz that indicates a category-defining product.
Layouts.dev has a 0.09 engagement ratio (below average), based on 61 discussions across 711 interest points. The low ratio suggests a launch that got attention but didn't convert that attention into sustained interest.
Within the Web Design category (369 total products), Supergrid by Depict ranks #5 and Layouts.dev ranks #6 by interest score. Supergrid by Depict sits in the top 10 for the category.
Supergrid by Depict is in the top 1% of Web Design by interest. Layouts.dev is in the top 2%.
Pick Supergrid by Depict if you want the product with the larger community behind it; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you prefer newer tools with fresher tech; you need something that also covers Artificial Intelligence.
Pick Layouts.dev if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; you value stability and a longer track record; you need something that also covers Developer Tools.
Supergrid by Depict: Design custom shopify storefront collection grids with editorial images/videos and dynamic AI sorting to boost shopper conversion. 1-click install, no-code required, with zero impact on site speed.
Layouts.dev: Layouts.dev is a notebook editor for building production-ready UI at super-speed with TailwindCSS & shadcn/ui. Design with a super simple syntax, use hundreds of prebuilt components and resources. Preview your build in real-time. Export production-grade React.
These products also compete in the Web Design category:
Lovable 2.0 โ Build apps and websites by chatting with AI, in multiplayer (Interest: 896, Engagement: 0.04)
html.to.design โ Convert any website into fully editable Figma designs (Interest: 506, Engagement: 0.31)
WebWave โ Ditch the grids, create websites like you design graphics (Interest: 493, Engagement: 1.11)
Shortcutter โ A new hot key, every day (Interest: 336, Engagement: 0.05)
stagewise โ The frontend coding agent for existing codebases (Interest: 325, Engagement: 0.11)
Clarity Dashboard UI โ Build your next dashboard faster than the speed of light (Interest: 304, Engagement: 0.14)
Either the product didn't meet our engagement threshold, or it doesn't share enough category tags with the other product to generate a meaningful comparison. We'd rather show no comparison than a misleading one.
Each product's data reflects its launch period. The comparison shows both products' engagement metrics from when they launched. The build date at the bottom of the page shows when the index was last refreshed.
Not yet. Current comparisons use launch-period data only. Post-launch tracking is on our roadmap.
Generally, yes. Engagement ratio is hard to fake. A product can generate artificial interest, but sustained discussion threads require people who actually used the product and had something to say about it.
Automatically. We compare products that share at least one category and have similar interest scores. Products too far apart in traction don't make for useful comparisons.
No. Interest is launch-day attention. Engagement ratio is a better quality signal. The product with more discussions per interest point usually has stronger product-market fit.