We get it: Layouts.dev and Permit.io look similar from the outside. The community engagement data tells you where they actually differ. Side-by-side metrics below.
Side-by-side comparison of Layouts.dev and Permit.io based on community engagement data.
A notebook for building interfaces with Tailwind & shadcn/UI
Never build permissions again
We get it: Layouts.dev and Permit.io look similar from the outside. The community engagement data tells you where they actually differ. Side-by-side metrics below.
| Category | Layouts.dev | Permit.io |
|---|---|---|
| API | - | Yes |
| Design Tools | Yes | - |
| Developer Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Development | Yes | Yes |
| Open Source | - | Yes |
| SaaS | - | Yes |
| Security | - | Yes |
| Web Design | Yes | - |
π Hey ProductHunt! I'm Severin, co-founder of Layouts.dev. Layouts.dev is a notebook-style editor designed for quickly building UIs using Tailwind. About a year ago, my co-founder Alex (a designer) and I started working on Layouts. We realized that moving from Figma to code was slowing down our iter...
Now if you build a Tooljet style UI to generate the DSL you will REALLY be onto something.
I wonder if thereβs a potential to turn this into a website builder, similar to how Wordpress utilizes Gutenberg. This is a great idea.
Hi everyone, Permit.io is finally on PH π€© Huge thank you to @benln, our hunter, for taking the time and believing in Permit.io ο»Ώο»ΏEvery application requires managing permissions, and complexity is constantly on the rise. Working on previous ventures, I found myself constantly rebuilding permissions f...
Congrats Or and team, excited about the launch!
You save lots of time for me thanks to your magic tool ππ»ππ»
Layouts.dev leads on raw interest score. Permit.io leads on engagement ratio. That split is worth paying attention to. Layouts.dev attracted more initial eyeballs, but Permit.io's audience engaged deeper. For most buyers, engagement ratio is the better signal.
These products share 2 categories: Developer Tools, Development. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Layouts.dev is also tagged in Design Tools, Web Design, which Permit.io isn't. That suggests Layouts.dev positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Permit.io has unique category tags in API, SaaS, Security. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Layouts.dev launched Oct 2024. Permit.io launched Sep 2023. Permit.io is the veteran here. Layouts.dev entered later, with the benefit of watching what worked and what didn't in the category.
Layouts.dev has a 0.09 engagement ratio (below average), based on 61 discussion threads across 711 interest points. Low engagement relative to interest means the launch attracted clicks but not conversation. Could indicate the product appealed to a broad audience without hooking anyone deeply.
Permit.io has a 0.18 engagement ratio (average), based on 122 discussions across 666 interest points. Average engagement for the category. Solid but not exceptional.
Within the Developer Tools category (5,444 total products), Layouts.dev ranks #65 and Permit.io ranks #89 by interest score. Both launched in a crowded field.
Layouts.dev is in the top 1% of Developer Tools by interest. Permit.io is in the top 2%.
Pick Layouts.dev if you want the product with the larger community behind it; you prefer newer tools with fresher tech; you need something that also covers Design Tools.
Pick Permit.io if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you value stability and a longer track record; you need something that also covers API.
Layouts.dev: Layouts.dev is a notebook editor for building production-ready UI at super-speed with TailwindCSS & shadcn/ui. Design with a super simple syntax, use hundreds of prebuilt components and resources. Preview your build in real-time. Export production-grade React.
Permit.io: Every application requires managing permissions, and complexity is constantly on the rise. Permit.io provides permissions as a service (ReBAC, Policy as Code, APIs, and customer-facing UI), so developers can check this as done and focus on their core product.
These products also compete in the Developer Tools, Development categories:
Pythagora 2.0 β World's first all-in-one AI dev platform (Interest: 697, Engagement: 0.08)
Instant SEO Audit β Check your website's SEO score instantly & boost traffic (Interest: 461, Engagement: 0.08)
liblab β Generate better SDKs for your API (Interest: 428, Engagement: 0.33)
Supametas.AI β Make any data RAG-ready in seconds (Interest: 408, Engagement: 0.09)
Uploadcare File Uploader β Take a shortcut to scalable and secure file uploads (Interest: 390, Engagement: 0.29)
Assistant by Mintlify β A conversational, agentic assistant built into your docs (Interest: 388, Engagement: 0.10)
No. Interest is launch-day attention. Engagement ratio is a better quality signal. The product with more discussions per interest point usually has stronger product-market fit.
How directly these products compete. Three or more shared categories means they're going after the same user. One shared category means they approach the space from different angles. Zero overlap and they probably shouldn't be compared.
Comparisons are generated automatically when two products have enough data overlap. If the pair you want isn't here, the products might be in different categories or too far apart in engagement.
Either the product didn't meet our engagement threshold, or it doesn't share enough category tags with the other product to generate a meaningful comparison. We'd rather show no comparison than a misleading one.
Each product's data reflects its launch period. The comparison shows both products' engagement metrics from when they launched. The build date at the bottom of the page shows when the index was last refreshed.
Not yet. Current comparisons use launch-period data only. Post-launch tracking is on our roadmap.