Two Task Management products. Different launch trajectories. Different engagement profiles. The side-by-side below covers the metrics that matter.
Side-by-side comparison of Making Today and Orchestra based on community engagement data.
Your all-in-one dashboard: organize, plan & do
A chat-centric workspace for builders and modern teams
Two Task Management products. Different launch trajectories. Different engagement profiles. The side-by-side below covers the metrics that matter.
| Category | Making Today | Orchestra |
|---|---|---|
| Calendar | Yes | - |
| Messaging | - | Yes |
| Productivity | Yes | Yes |
| Task Management | Yes | Yes |
Tab fatigue is real. Constantly switching between email, calendar, project management tools, pull requests, CI/CD pipelines, task lists, design files, notes, and team chat apps just to stay on top of everything—all while trying to focus on the actual work we're meant to be doing. It often feels like...
Alhamdulillah!!! Excellent product. Aside from the hassle-free tab switching, the best thing I found was the drag-and-drop function and the ability to see everything related to your work at a glance. It's like having a satellite view of your project with a remote controller in your hand. Congratulat...
Looks dope! Chrome extension doesn't seem to work on Arc browser though
Hey Product Hunters 👋 We're excited to launch Orchestra to your incredible community! The idea for Orchestra came from one big pain point — the frustration of fragmented work: Threads and channels overloaded with noise, all demanding attention. Multiple disconnected tools with important data scatter...
Great idea and amazing work! Here to support Founder U folks!
Great idea! It looks like a combination of Discord and Notion.
Making Today leads on raw interest score. Orchestra leads on engagement ratio. That split is worth paying attention to. Making Today attracted more initial eyeballs, but Orchestra's audience engaged deeper. For most buyers, engagement ratio is the better signal.
These products share 2 categories: Productivity, Task Management. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Making Today is also tagged in Calendar, which Orchestra isn't. That suggests Making Today positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Orchestra has unique category tags in Messaging. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Making Today launched Aug 2024. Orchestra launched Oct 2025. Making Today has had more time to iterate and build a user base. Orchestra had the advantage of launching into a more defined market with clearer user expectations.
Making Today has a 0.23 engagement ratio (average), based on 184 discussion threads across 810 interest points. Middle of the pack for Task Management. Enough discussion to suggest real usage, but not the kind of buzz that indicates a category-defining product.
Orchestra has a 0.27 engagement ratio (average), based on 217 discussions across 803 interest points. Average engagement for the category. Solid but not exceptional.
Within the Productivity category (10,876 total products), Making Today ranks #96 and Orchestra ranks #100 by interest score. Both launched in a crowded field.
Making Today is in the top 1% of Productivity by interest. Orchestra is in the top 1%.
Pick Making Today if you want the product with the larger community behind it; you value stability and a longer track record; you need something that also covers Calendar.
Pick Orchestra if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you prefer newer tools with fresher tech; you need something that also covers Messaging.
Making Today: Making Today combines your apps and notifications into one dashboard, making it easy to stay organized. Manage meetings, todos, pull requests, jira/linear tickets, notes, bookmarks and more—all without switching tabs.
Orchestra: Orchestra makes workflow simple for teams who build products and rely on communication. With messaging at its core, and a task tracker and AI agents natively built in, work contexts are aligned and teams are connected.
These products also compete in the Productivity, Task Management categories:
Cap — Beautiful screen recordings, owned by you. 100% open source. (Interest: 1,064, Engagement: 0.08)
Internet Is Beautiful — Discover the most interesting, weird and awesome websites (Interest: 544, Engagement: 0.17)
Jiffy Reader — Read anything on the internet faster and more clearly (Interest: 502, Engagement: 0.17)
CoPilot.Live — Your personalised AI assistant (Interest: 408, Engagement: 0.49)
Outlit — AI agents for your SaaS deals (Interest: 373, Engagement: 0.23)
Slashit App — Turn your common text into shortcuts and work faster with AI (Interest: 327, Engagement: 0.23)
How directly these products compete. Three or more shared categories means they're going after the same user. One shared category means they approach the space from different angles. Zero overlap and they probably shouldn't be compared.
Comparisons are generated automatically when two products have enough data overlap. If the pair you want isn't here, the products might be in different categories or too far apart in engagement.
Either the product didn't meet our engagement threshold, or it doesn't share enough category tags with the other product to generate a meaningful comparison. We'd rather show no comparison than a misleading one.
Each product's data reflects its launch period. The comparison shows both products' engagement metrics from when they launched. The build date at the bottom of the page shows when the index was last refreshed.
Not yet. Current comparisons use launch-period data only. Post-launch tracking is on our roadmap.
Generally, yes. Engagement ratio is hard to fake. A product can generate artificial interest, but sustained discussion threads require people who actually used the product and had something to say about it.