Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace launched with a 829 interest score. Startup Recipes pulled 612. Raw numbers are a start, but engagement ratio and category positioning tell you more. Both are below.
Side-by-side comparison of Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace and Startup Recipes based on community engagement data.
Where AI turns ideas into prototypes, plans, briefs and more
The ultimate MVP cheat sheet with 60+ startup formulas
Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace launched with a 829 interest score. Startup Recipes pulled 612. Raw numbers are a start, but engagement ratio and category positioning tell you more. Both are below.
| Category | Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace | Startup Recipes |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | - |
| No-Code | - | Yes |
| Productivity | Yes | - |
| Prototyping | Yes | Yes |
| Side Project | - | Yes |
Hey there, Jeff here, heading up Product at Miro! This one’s for all the innovators and collaborators out there. I’m beyond excited to put our latest features to the test among the Product Hunt community. Today, we’re launching Miro’s Innovation Workspace. This new AI-powered platform gives you ever...
I really like using the full functionality in my work. This is convenient and simplifies teamwork on tasks. I'm glad you're not standing still!
Congrats on the launch of 2.0, @jjchow and team! Love the "innovation workspace" concept, and the AI-powered prototyping looks amazing. Keep up the great work!
Really disappointed. Purchased this for a specific concept that was under the Twitch idea and found only one tool. No processes, no recipes, nothing. Definition of wasting time and money.
This is the dope product! Thanks @yucelfaruksahan for making this 🙌
A breath of fresh air into what Lean Startup is all about. I do think that to build technology you almost inevitably must know how to build technology (such as being able to code well), however, this is a great resource for both technical and non-technical founders, and possibly the right mindset an...
Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace leads on raw interest score. Startup Recipes leads on engagement ratio. That split is worth paying attention to. Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace attracted more initial eyeballs, but Startup Recipes's audience engaged deeper. For most buyers, engagement ratio is the better signal.
These products share 1 categories: Prototyping. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace is also tagged in Artificial Intelligence, Productivity, which Startup Recipes isn't. That suggests Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Startup Recipes has unique category tags in No-Code, Side Project. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace launched Oct 2024. Startup Recipes launched Jan 2022. Startup Recipes is the veteran here. Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace entered later, with the benefit of watching what worked and what didn't in the category.
Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace has a 0.03 engagement ratio (low), based on 22 discussion threads across 829 interest points. Low engagement relative to interest means the launch attracted clicks but not conversation. Could indicate the product appealed to a broad audience without hooking anyone deeply.
Startup Recipes has a 0.26 engagement ratio (average), based on 158 discussions across 612 interest points. Average engagement for the category. Solid but not exceptional.
The 0.23 gap in engagement ratio is significant. Startup Recipes generated substantially deeper community discussion per interest point.
Within the Prototyping category (103 total products), Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace ranks #3 and Startup Recipes ranks #4 by interest score. Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace sits in the top 10 for the category.
Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace is in the top 3% of Prototyping by interest. Startup Recipes is in the top 4%.
Pick Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace if you want the product with the larger community behind it; you prefer newer tools with fresher tech; you need something that also covers Artificial Intelligence.
Pick Startup Recipes if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you value stability and a longer track record; you need something that also covers No-Code.
Miro 2.0 The Innovation Workspace: Seamlessly move from unstructured to structured work in one AI-powered workspace. Turn sticky notes into a clean, formatted document, visualize project data in tables and timelines with a click, and use AI to create prototypes from ideas in seconds.
Startup Recipes: Learning lean startup is easy, putting it into practice is hard! Startup Recipes is a cheat sheet that helps idea-stage entrepreneurs to find product-market fit as quickly as possible by building minimum viable products right!
These products also compete in the Prototyping category:
OpenUI — Describe UI and see it rendered live (Interest: 550, Engagement: 0.06)
Paraflow — The canvas-based product design agent. (Interest: 531, Engagement: 0.30)
a0.dev — Generate full mobile apps with AI (Interest: 497, Engagement: 0.10)
Alloy — AI prototyping with your real app (Interest: 442, Engagement: 0.21)
Flowriver — Product research tool for mobile apps creators (Interest: 430, Engagement: 0.11)
Spec Coding by Capacity — Vibe Coding with a planning assistant to build with clarity (Interest: 326, Engagement: 0.13)
Either the product didn't meet our engagement threshold, or it doesn't share enough category tags with the other product to generate a meaningful comparison. We'd rather show no comparison than a misleading one.
Each product's data reflects its launch period. The comparison shows both products' engagement metrics from when they launched. The build date at the bottom of the page shows when the index was last refreshed.
Not yet. Current comparisons use launch-period data only. Post-launch tracking is on our roadmap.
Generally, yes. Engagement ratio is hard to fake. A product can generate artificial interest, but sustained discussion threads require people who actually used the product and had something to say about it.
Automatically. We compare products that share at least one category and have similar interest scores. Products too far apart in traction don't make for useful comparisons.
No. Interest is launch-day attention. Engagement ratio is a better quality signal. The product with more discussions per interest point usually has stronger product-market fit.