Osmos and Startups Leaderboards compete for similar users in Remote Work. One pulled more initial interest. The other generated deeper discussions. Which metric matters more depends on what you're optimizing for.
Side-by-side comparison of Osmos and Startups Leaderboards based on community engagement data.
Match with like-minded professionals for 1:1 conversations
Can you make $1,000?
Osmos and Startups Leaderboards compete for similar users in Remote Work. One pulled more initial interest. The other generated deeper discussions. Which metric matters more depends on what you're optimizing for.
| Category | Osmos | Startups Leaderboards |
|---|---|---|
| Community | Yes | - |
| Developer Tools | - | Yes |
| Remote Work | Yes | Yes |
| Side Project | - | Yes |
| Social Media | Yes | - |
🎉 Hi, I'm Natalia, and I started a networking tool Osmos because I hate networking 1. I hate LinkedIn, where you have tons of connections but don’t actually know anyone. 2. I hate conferences because networking there is just swapping contacts, promising to follow up, and then trying to sell somethin...
Congrats on reaching 1st of the day and 1st of the week! I wanted to mention a few things that would have helped draw me in. Even after reading the top paragraph, reviewing all the photo slides, and reading your website, I still didn't really understand what your product was. I've read a bunch of yo...
The thing I struggle to get past is the website does not convince me that there are a lot of people on it or that they are worth meeting. Getting paywalled so early without having any idea on the potential people I could meet is a non-starter. There needs to be greater transparency around this, beca...
Hey PH, long time no see (5 months) I think it's fair to say we are building tiny startups from Thailand because we got inspired from Pieter Levels? So I built a game for entrepreneurs — Introducing IndiePage Startup Leaderboards 🏆 1. Connect your Stripe account(s) 2. Climb the leaderboards 3. Get f...
Cool project, will you also add paddle as a payment provider? Anyways, good luck, love what you’re doing Marc
This is really touching the real product hunt soul.
Osmos leads on raw interest score. Osmos leads on engagement ratio. Osmos leads on both metrics. That doesn't happen often.
These products share 1 categories: Remote Work. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Osmos is also tagged in Community, Social Media, which Startups Leaderboards isn't. That suggests Osmos positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Startups Leaderboards has unique category tags in Developer Tools, Side Project. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Osmos launched Sep 2024. Startups Leaderboards launched Aug 2024. Both launched the same year, meaning they faced similar market conditions and competition levels.
Osmos has a 0.18 engagement ratio (average), based on 221 discussion threads across 1,220 interest points. Middle of the pack for Remote Work. Enough discussion to suggest real usage, but not the kind of buzz that indicates a category-defining product.
Startups Leaderboards has a 0.07 engagement ratio (below average), based on 75 discussions across 1,029 interest points. The low ratio suggests a launch that got attention but didn't convert that attention into sustained interest.
Within the Remote Work category (501 total products), Osmos ranks #1 and Startups Leaderboards ranks #2 by interest score. Osmos sits in the top 10 for the category.
Osmos is in the top 0% of Remote Work by interest. Startups Leaderboards is in the top 0%.
Pick Osmos if you want the product with the larger community behind it; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you need something that also covers Community.
Pick Startups Leaderboards if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; you need something that also covers Developer Tools.
Osmos: Osmos matches entrepreneurs and professionals for meaningful 1-on-1 conversations. Osmos helps you find like-minded peers, gain rare industry insights, and build a network that cares—no small talk, no shallow connections, just real opportunities and support.
Startups Leaderboards: Showcase all your startups on a single page with IndiePage to compete with other solo developers and climb the leaderboard!
These products also compete in the Remote Work category:
Thursday — Where remote teams do their socials, no sign up required (Interest: 811, Engagement: 0.47)
Tella 2.0 — Record instantly shareable videos, from your web browser (Interest: 590, Engagement: 0.23)
Minutes — Make your meetings async with voice and video (Interest: 394, Engagement: 0.20)
Beseda — Async video and audio messaging for remote teams (Interest: 393, Engagement: 0.36)
LiarLiar.ai — Combining psychology with computer vision (Interest: 360, Engagement: 0.60)
Zight AI — Press record and let Zight AI improve your workflow (Interest: 316, Engagement: 0.12)
Comparisons are generated automatically when two products have enough data overlap. If the pair you want isn't here, the products might be in different categories or too far apart in engagement.
Either the product didn't meet our engagement threshold, or it doesn't share enough category tags with the other product to generate a meaningful comparison. We'd rather show no comparison than a misleading one.
Each product's data reflects its launch period. The comparison shows both products' engagement metrics from when they launched. The build date at the bottom of the page shows when the index was last refreshed.
Not yet. Current comparisons use launch-period data only. Post-launch tracking is on our roadmap.
Generally, yes. Engagement ratio is hard to fake. A product can generate artificial interest, but sustained discussion threads require people who actually used the product and had something to say about it.
Automatically. We compare products that share at least one category and have similar interest scores. Products too far apart in traction don't make for useful comparisons.