Forget the feature comparison matrices. Here's how the community responded to Raycast Notes vs Fig at launch. Interest scores, engagement depth, and category analysis.
Side-by-side comparison of Raycast Notes and Fig based on community engagement data.
Fast, light, and frictionless note-taking
Autocomplete for the Terminal
Forget the feature comparison matrices. Here's how the community responded to Raycast Notes vs Fig at launch. Interest scores, engagement depth, and category analysis.
| Category | Raycast Notes | Fig |
|---|---|---|
| Developer Tools | - | Yes |
| Mac | Yes | Yes |
| Productivity | Yes | Yes |
| Writing | Yes | - |
Hi all! Nichlas from Raycast here π Weβre really excited to finally present our latest feature, Raycast Notes! We believe itβs a significant improvement over our previous Floating Notes, from which we received so much valuable feedback from all of you π This project has been super fun and challengin...
I'm big fan of raycast, and this feature is really cool to have notes on place. thanks for the update!
For anyone who hasn't already tried @Raycast , the Raycast Notes experience is almost reason enough. The markdown support is excellent. It's essentially like having your favorite markdown note taking app always a shortcut away. Fantastic job guys.
Love the idea and the execution is just π€― Now I'm just wondering how I could use a Terminal without it!! Congrats for this amazing product!
Been using this for a while man, love it
Wow I have been begging for something like this to exist for year. This totally changes the game and has saved me hours of checking stack overflow
Raycast Notes leads on raw interest score. Fig leads on engagement ratio. That split is worth paying attention to. Raycast Notes attracted more initial eyeballs, but Fig's audience engaged deeper. For most buyers, engagement ratio is the better signal.
These products share 2 categories: Mac, Productivity. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Raycast Notes is also tagged in Writing, which Fig isn't. That suggests Raycast Notes positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Fig has unique category tags in Developer Tools. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Raycast Notes launched Nov 2024. Fig launched Jan 2022. Fig is the veteran here. Raycast Notes entered later, with the benefit of watching what worked and what didn't in the category.
Pick Raycast Notes if you want the product with the larger community behind it; you prefer newer tools with fresher tech; you need something that also covers Writing.
Pick Fig if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you value stability and a longer track record; you need something that also covers Developer Tools.
Raycast Notes: Raycast Notes makes it frictionless to organize your thoughts from anywhere on your Mac. Track todos, save meeting notes, and collect ideas. Designed to be lightweight with Markdown support and just a keystroke away.
Fig: Fig makes engineers more productive in the terminal. β Our first product adds visual completions for hundreds of public CLI tools like cd, git, npm/yarn, docker, and aws. β Want private autocomplete? Create your own completions and share them with your team!
These products also compete in the Mac, Productivity categories:
Orchestra β A chat-centric workspace for builders and modern teams (Interest: 803, Engagement: 0.27)
Supabase AI Assistant [LW24] β Idea to Postgres database (Interest: 759, Engagement: 0.13)
Blobr β Get your branded API portal in minutes (Interest: 371, Engagement: 0.34)
Cohere Chime β Let customers call you with one click and zero setup. (Interest: 369, Engagement: 0.21)
V7 Go β Automate multi modal tasks using GenAI, reliably, at scale (Interest: 351, Engagement: 0.16)
Hexofy β Capture data from any page, like magic (Interest: 311, Engagement: 0.32)
No. Interest is launch-day attention. Engagement ratio is a better quality signal. The product with more discussions per interest point usually has stronger product-market fit.
How directly these products compete. Three or more shared categories means they're going after the same user. One shared category means they approach the space from different angles. Zero overlap and they probably shouldn't be compared.
Comparisons are generated automatically when two products have enough data overlap. If the pair you want isn't here, the products might be in different categories or too far apart in engagement.
Either the product didn't meet our engagement threshold, or it doesn't share enough category tags with the other product to generate a meaningful comparison. We'd rather show no comparison than a misleading one.
Each product's data reflects its launch period. The comparison shows both products' engagement metrics from when they launched. The build date at the bottom of the page shows when the index was last refreshed.
Not yet. Current comparisons use launch-period data only. Post-launch tracking is on our roadmap.