I'd look at engagement ratio before interest score when comparing Tally 2.0 and Clueso. A product can buy visibility. It can't buy sustained discussion.
Side-by-side comparison of Tally 2.0 and Clueso based on community engagement data.
The simplest way to create forms for free
Create stunning product videos in minutes with AI
I'd look at engagement ratio before interest score when comparing Tally 2.0 and Clueso. A product can buy visibility. It can't buy sustained discussion.
| Category | Tally 2.0 | Clueso |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence | - | Yes |
| No-Code | Yes | - |
| Productivity | Yes | - |
| SaaS | Yes | Yes |
| Video | - | Yes |
Back in March 2021, we launched the first version of Tally on Product Hunt. Fast forward to today—more than 100 updates and over 140,000 happy users later—we're super excited to introduce you to Tally 2.0 ! We have a new logo, a redesign, and lots of product improvements in store for you—making Tall...
amazing idea big congrats on the launch guys.
Love the elegance and simplicity of it! Well done!
Hey Product Hunt Community! 👋 I'm Neel, co-founder of Clueso, and I'm really excited to launch Clueso for the first time on PH! Why did we build Clueso? Many of us build amazing products but struggle to effectively demo them, or educate our users about them. We faced this problem first-hand at our p...
i was literally looking for an app like that,thats awesome ngl
Wow, amazing product! I don’t know how I missed this! Congrats!
Tally 2.0 leads on raw interest score. Clueso leads on engagement ratio. That split is worth paying attention to. Tally 2.0 attracted more initial eyeballs, but Clueso's audience engaged deeper. For most buyers, engagement ratio is the better signal.
These products share 1 categories: SaaS. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Tally 2.0 is also tagged in No-Code, Productivity, which Clueso isn't. That suggests Tally 2.0 positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Clueso has unique category tags in Artificial Intelligence, Video. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Tally 2.0 launched Sep 2023. Clueso launched Jul 2025. Tally 2.0 has had more time to iterate and build a user base. Clueso had the advantage of launching into a more defined market with clearer user expectations.
Tally 2.0 has a 0.24 engagement ratio (average), based on 345 discussion threads across 1,444 interest points. Middle of the pack for SaaS. Enough discussion to suggest real usage, but not the kind of buzz that indicates a category-defining product.
Clueso has a 0.25 engagement ratio (average), based on 328 discussions across 1,323 interest points. Average engagement for the category. Solid but not exceptional.
Within the SaaS category (4,003 total products), Tally 2.0 ranks #2 and Clueso ranks #3 by interest score. Tally 2.0 sits in the top 10 for the category.
Tally 2.0 is in the top 0% of SaaS by interest. Clueso is in the top 0%.
Pick Tally 2.0 if you want the product with the larger community behind it; you value stability and a longer track record; you need something that also covers No-Code.
Pick Clueso if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you prefer newer tools with fresher tech; you need something that also covers Artificial Intelligence.
Tally 2.0: Say goodbye to boring forms. Meet Tally — the free, intuitive form builder you’ve been looking for.
Clueso: Clueso is the fastest and easiest way to create stunning product videos. It converts raw screen recordings into studio-quality videos and step-by-step articles in minutes. No editing or design skills needed.
These products also compete in the SaaS category:
Atlas — Vibe pricing in seconds (Interest: 640, Engagement: 0.28)
Product Video Examples — Learn from the best product videos on the internet (Interest: 438, Engagement: 0.19)
liblab — Generate better SDKs for your API (Interest: 428, Engagement: 0.33)
Worthless — We don't even have a tagline (Interest: 401, Engagement: 0.22)
Assistant by Mintlify — A conversational, agentic assistant built into your docs (Interest: 388, Engagement: 0.10)
Reloop — Create winning ads without prompts or skills (Interest: 337, Engagement: 0.12)
Each product's data reflects its launch period. The comparison shows both products' engagement metrics from when they launched. The build date at the bottom of the page shows when the index was last refreshed.
Not yet. Current comparisons use launch-period data only. Post-launch tracking is on our roadmap.
Generally, yes. Engagement ratio is hard to fake. A product can generate artificial interest, but sustained discussion threads require people who actually used the product and had something to say about it.
Automatically. We compare products that share at least one category and have similar interest scores. Products too far apart in traction don't make for useful comparisons.
No. Interest is launch-day attention. Engagement ratio is a better quality signal. The product with more discussions per interest point usually has stronger product-market fit.
How directly these products compete. Three or more shared categories means they're going after the same user. One shared category means they approach the space from different angles. Zero overlap and they probably shouldn't be compared.