Both Widgets for Stripe and Creem 1.0 are in our Payments index. Both crossed our engagement threshold. Here's how they compare on the numbers that are hard to fake.
Side-by-side comparison of Widgets for Stripe and Creem 1.0 based on community engagement data.
Your revenue info at a glance in the coolest way possible
Split SaaS revenue with partners, sell without headaches
Both Widgets for Stripe and Creem 1.0 are in our Payments index. Both crossed our engagement threshold. Here's how they compare on the numbers that are hard to fake.
| Category | Widgets for Stripe | Creem 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Crypto | - | Yes |
| Fintech | - | Yes |
| Payments | Yes | Yes |
| SaaS | Yes | - |
| iOS | Yes | - |
Hey hunters! 🤙🏼 A while ago I was searching on my iPhone for widgets for displaying the revenue of my little Stripe projects. Turned out that they didn't exists, so I built my owns :) I made cool widgets for displaying your stats in different ways: revenue amount, charts, GitHub like grid graph, MRR...
How do I generate an API key? Non developer here
Juanjo is a great builder, and this is a powerful widget to give valuable insight into stripe revenue on your home screen!
Hey Product Hunt 👋 I’m Gabriel, co-founder of Creem. Today we’re launching Creem 1.0 — and this one feels special. Why we started Creem As SaaS founders, we kept losing time and money dealing with: Payments in different markets Sales tax and compliance Global payouts Instead of building our product,...
Looks really really cool! What's the differentiation from Lemon Squeezy?
@sudoferraz thanks for laughing
Widgets for Stripe leads on raw interest score. Creem 1.0 leads on engagement ratio. That split is worth paying attention to. Widgets for Stripe attracted more initial eyeballs, but Creem 1.0's audience engaged deeper. For most buyers, engagement ratio is the better signal.
These products share 1 categories: Payments. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Widgets for Stripe is also tagged in SaaS, iOS, which Creem 1.0 isn't. That suggests Widgets for Stripe positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Creem 1.0 has unique category tags in Crypto, Fintech. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Widgets for Stripe launched Oct 2024. Creem 1.0 launched Aug 2025. Widgets for Stripe has had more time to iterate and build a user base. Creem 1.0 had the advantage of launching into a more defined market with clearer user expectations.
Pick Widgets for Stripe if you want the product with the larger community behind it; you value stability and a longer track record; you need something that also covers iOS.
Pick Creem 1.0 if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you prefer newer tools with fresher tech; you need something that also covers Fintech.
Widgets for Stripe: Add lovely widgets on your iPhone, Mac, or iPad displaying key information about your Stripe businesses. You can have at a glance: - Revenue - Charts - Grid Contribution Graph with your sales — like your GitHub one - MRR Add as many projects as you want!
Creem 1.0: Smooth payments for SaaS 🤝 Split revenue with partners anywhere. 🌍 Get paid in 80+ currencies, 100+ countries & stablecoins. 🤖 AI assistant that knows your business data. 💳 Sell with subscriptions & one-time payments without Tax headaches.
These products also compete in the Payments category:
ByeDispute — Prevent disputes before getting banned from Stripe (Interest: 719, Engagement: 0.20)
HyperSwitch — Fast, reliable, and affordable open source payments switch (Interest: 654, Engagement: 0.62)
ChaChing — Cut Stripe’s billing fees in half & keep Stripe for payments (Interest: 424, Engagement: 0.15)
Clientjoy 2.0 — A CRM that is better than Excel, simpler than Hubspot (Interest: 378, Engagement: 0.56)
Fake It Till You Make It — Build a unicorn overnight (Interest: 310, Engagement: 0.13)
ZenVoice — Stripe invoices without the fee (Interest: 310, Engagement: 0.17)
Each product's data reflects its launch period. The comparison shows both products' engagement metrics from when they launched. The build date at the bottom of the page shows when the index was last refreshed.
Not yet. Current comparisons use launch-period data only. Post-launch tracking is on our roadmap.
Generally, yes. Engagement ratio is hard to fake. A product can generate artificial interest, but sustained discussion threads require people who actually used the product and had something to say about it.
Automatically. We compare products that share at least one category and have similar interest scores. Products too far apart in traction don't make for useful comparisons.
No. Interest is launch-day attention. Engagement ratio is a better quality signal. The product with more discussions per interest point usually has stronger product-market fit.
How directly these products compete. Three or more shared categories means they're going after the same user. One shared category means they approach the space from different angles. Zero overlap and they probably shouldn't be compared.