I've tracked 228 Blockchain launches since 2021. Volume alone is misleading. A category can have fewer launches but higher engagement per product (maturation) or exploding volume with declining quality (saturation). You need both numbers.
Five years of Blockchain launch data. Volume, engagement, and the products that stood out.
I've tracked 228 Blockchain launches since 2021. Volume alone is misleading. A category can have fewer launches but higher engagement per product (maturation) or exploding volume with declining quality (saturation). You need both numbers.
| Quarter | Launches | Avg Interest Score | Top Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2026 | 1 | 18 | Selanet AI |
| Q1 2025 | 5 | 84 | GPTSeek |
| Q2 2025 | 6 | 63 | QU3 |
| Q3 2025 | 4 | 96 | Crates |
| Q4 2025 | 6 | 39 | Khorus |
| Q1 2024 | 12 | 101 | Perspect |
| Q2 2024 | 6 | 155 | Artizyou |
| Q3 2024 | 8 | 106 | Lofty |
| Q4 2024 | 4 | 158 | AIxBlock |
| Q1 2023 | 21 | 99 | DL3ARN |
| Q2 2023 | 16 | 87 | One Click Crypto |
| Q3 2023 | 19 | 184 | Clustr |
| Q4 2023 | 15 | 98 | Galxe |
| Q1 2022 | 14 | 117 | Dakiya |
| Q2 2022 | 19 | 102 | OnJuno |
| Q3 2022 | 19 | 83 | Via Protocol |
The Blockchain category has been cooling over the past 6 years of tracked data. Total launches went from 21 in 2021 to 1 in 2026.
Average engagement ratio across all Blockchain launches sits at 0.42. Products above that threshold tend to serve a real, specific need. Products below it often entered a crowded market without sufficient differentiation.
Launch volume dropped 95% year-over-year, but average engagement per product rose by 55%. Fewer builders are entering Blockchain, but the ones that do are finding a more receptive audience. That's a textbook market gap signal.
At least three. Two data points is a line, not a trend. We have five years of data for most categories, which is enough to distinguish real shifts from noise.
Current year launches compared to the same period last year. Positive means more products launching. Negative means the category cooled. Neither is inherently good or bad. A mature category with fewer but better launches is often healthier than one flooding the market with clones.
Launch volume drops but engagement per product rises. Fewer builders entering, but the ones that do find a more receptive audience. That's an opportunity signal. We flag it when we see it.
We report what happened. We don't predict. Five years of data shows patterns, but markets surprise people for a living.
Three common reasons. The market consolidated around winners. The technology matured and stopped generating new startups. Or builder attention shifted to adjacent categories. Usually it's a combination.