I've tracked 228 Blockchain launches since 2021. Volume alone is misleading. A category can have fewer launches but higher engagement per product (maturation) or exploding volume with declining quality (saturation). You need both numbers.
Five years of Blockchain launch data. Volume, engagement, and the products that stood out.
I've tracked 228 Blockchain launches since 2021. Volume alone is misleading. A category can have fewer launches but higher engagement per product (maturation) or exploding volume with declining quality (saturation). You need both numbers.
| Quarter | Launches | Avg Interest Score | Top Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2026 | 1 | 18 | Selanet AI |
| Q1 2025 | 5 | 84 | GPTSeek |
| Q2 2025 | 6 | 63 | QU3 |
| Q3 2025 | 4 | 96 | Crates |
| Q4 2025 | 6 | 39 | Khorus |
| Q1 2024 | 12 | 101 | Perspect |
| Q2 2024 | 6 | 155 | Artizyou |
| Q3 2024 | 8 | 106 | Lofty |
| Q4 2024 | 4 | 158 | AIxBlock |
| Q1 2023 | 21 | 99 | DL3ARN |
| Q2 2023 | 16 | 87 | One Click Crypto |
| Q3 2023 | 19 | 184 | Clustr |
| Q4 2023 | 15 | 98 | Galxe |
| Q1 2022 | 14 | 117 | Dakiya |
| Q2 2022 | 19 | 102 | OnJuno |
| Q3 2022 | 19 | 83 | Via Protocol |
The Blockchain category has been cooling over the past 6 years of tracked data. Total launches went from 21 in 2021 to 1 in 2026.
Average engagement ratio across all Blockchain launches: 0.42. Products above that line tend to solve a specific, painful problem. Products below it often entered a crowded space without clear differentiation.
Blockchain peaked in 2022 with 84 launches. That was 4 years ago. The decline since then could signal market consolidation, saturation, or attention shifting to adjacent categories.
Average engagement per product has risen from 0.17 in 2021 to 0.72 in 2026. That upward trend means the community is spending more time with each new launch. Either the products are getting better, or the audience is getting more selective. Probably both.
The highest-performing quarter was Q3 2023, with an average interest score of 184 across 19 launches. Clustr led that quarter.
99 B2B launches (43%) vs 129 B2C (57%) across the full Blockchain dataset. The split is close to even. Blockchain serves both business buyers and individual users.
2021: 21 launches. Average interest: 110. Average engagement: 0.17. Top launch: Mars Genesis (216 interest).
2022: 84 launches (+300% vs 2021). Average interest: 98. Average engagement: 0.34. Top launch: Multis (344 interest).
2023: 71 launches (-15% vs 2022). Average interest: 119. Average engagement: 0.39. Top launch: Clustr (1,514 interest).
2024: 30 launches (-58% vs 2023). Average interest: 121. Average engagement: 0.86. Top launch: Artizyou (519 interest).
2025: 21 launches (-30% vs 2024). Average interest: 68. Average engagement: 0.47. Top launch: GPTSeek (240 interest).
2026: 1 launches (-95% vs 2025). Average interest: 18. Average engagement: 0.72. Top launch: Selanet AI (18 interest).
Launch volume dropped 95% year-over-year, but average engagement per product rose by 55%. Fewer builders are entering Blockchain, but the ones that do are finding a more receptive audience. That's a textbook market gap signal.
At least three. Two data points is a line, not a trend. We have five years of data for most categories, which is enough to distinguish real shifts from noise.
Current year launches compared to the same period last year. Positive means more products launching. Negative means the category cooled. Neither is inherently good or bad. A mature category with fewer but better launches is often healthier than one flooding the market with clones.
Launch volume drops but engagement per product rises. Fewer builders entering, but the ones that do find a more receptive audience. That's an opportunity signal. We flag it when we see it.
We report what happened. We don't predict. Five years of data shows patterns, but markets surprise people for a living.
Three common reasons. The market consolidated around winners. The technology matured and stopped generating new startups. Or builder attention shifted to adjacent categories. Usually it's a combination.
Volume without engagement is saturation. Engagement without volume is opportunity. Check which one you're looking at.
Sum of all interest scores in the quarter divided by number of products. Simple average. We don't weight by category or product age.