Five years. 186 Cryptocurrency products. Every quarter analyzed. This page tells you whether the category is worth entering, worth investing in, or worth avoiding.
Five years of Cryptocurrency launch data. Volume, engagement, and the products that stood out.
Five years. 186 Cryptocurrency products. Every quarter analyzed. This page tells you whether the category is worth entering, worth investing in, or worth avoiding.
| Quarter | Launches | Avg Interest Score | Top Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2026 | 4 | 92 | Walme Wallet |
| Q1 2025 | 5 | 45 | Paymento |
| Q2 2025 | 3 | 63 | Exvero |
| Q3 2025 | 4 | 13 | Hedge UI |
| Q1 2024 | 7 | 132 | Sharpe Labs |
| Q2 2024 | 4 | 101 | Hexn.io |
| Q3 2024 | 8 | 73 | storychat.app |
| Q4 2024 | 4 | 114 | Coinfella |
| Q1 2023 | 17 | 85 | YETI Web3.0 Wallet |
| Q2 2023 | 15 | 97 | SatoshiGPT |
| Q3 2023 | 6 | 96 | ChainVision.io |
| Q4 2023 | 6 | 90 | ChainDon |
| Q1 2022 | 12 | 119 | Hustleverse |
| Q2 2022 | 16 | 78 | Invezo |
| Q3 2022 | 21 | 97 | Plasma Wallet |
| Q4 2022 | 20 | 105 | Multis |
The Cryptocurrency category has been cooling over the past 6 years of tracked data. Total launches went from 34 in 2021 to 4 in 2026.
Average engagement ratio across all Cryptocurrency launches: 0.44. Products above that line tend to solve a specific, painful problem. Products below it often entered a crowded space without clear differentiation.
Cryptocurrency peaked in 2022 with 69 launches. That was 4 years ago. The decline since then could signal market consolidation, saturation, or attention shifting to adjacent categories.
Average engagement per product dropped from 0.32 in 2021 to 0.24 in 2026. More products competing for the same attention pool. The community is spread thinner, which makes high-engagement launches more impressive.
The highest-performing quarter was Q1 2024, with an average interest score of 132 across 7 launches. Sharpe Labs led that quarter.
Launch volume drops but engagement per product rises. Fewer builders entering, but the ones that do find a more receptive audience. That's an opportunity signal. We flag it when we see it.
We report what happened. We don't predict. Five years of data shows patterns, but markets surprise people for a living.
Three common reasons. The market consolidated around winners. The technology matured and stopped generating new startups. Or builder attention shifted to adjacent categories. Usually it's a combination.
Volume without engagement is saturation. Engagement without volume is opportunity. Check which one you're looking at.
Sum of all interest scores in the quarter divided by number of products. Simple average. We don't weight by category or product age.
Depends on what's declining. If volume drops but engagement rises, the market is maturing. That's often good for existing players. If both drop, the category may be dying. The quarterly breakdown on each page tells you which pattern you're seeing.
At least three. Two data points is a line, not a trend. We have five years of data for most categories, which is enough to distinguish real shifts from noise.