Five years of Database launch data. Volume, engagement, and the products that stood out.
We've been tracking Database since 2021. 148 products indexed. The trajectory tells you where builders are investing and where the market sees opportunity.
Below: launch volume by year, engagement patterns by quarter, and the products that defined each period.
| Quarter | Launches | Avg Interest Score | Top Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2026 | 11 | 167 | InsForge |
| Q1 2025 | 9 | 130 | Prisma Postgres |
| Q2 2025 | 11 | 133 | Keboola MCP Server |
| Q3 2025 | 8 | 137 | Teable 2.0 |
| Q4 2025 | 6 | 130 | Reindeer |
| Q1 2024 | 10 | 99 | Qubinets |
| Q2 2024 | 12 | 258 | Retable |
| Q3 2024 | 9 | 159 | OpenEngine by Datazip |
| Q4 2024 | 8 | 482 | Boost.space 4.0 |
| Q1 2023 | 9 | 96 | Extensive Investor List |
| Q2 2023 | 13 | 125 | Estuary Flow |
| Q3 2023 | 13 | 117 | Cedalio |
| Q4 2023 | 7 | 81 | SuperDuperDB |
| Q1 2022 | 4 | 159 | Upstash |
| Q2 2022 | 5 | 127 | Accelerator Hunt |
| Q3 2022 | 1 | 166 | DoubleCloud |
The Database category has been accelerating over the past 5 years of tracked data. Total launches went from 22 in 2022 to 11 in 2026.
Average engagement ratio across all Database launches: 0.24. Products above that line tend to solve a specific, painful problem. Products below it often entered a crowded space without clear differentiation.
Database peaked in 2023 with 42 launches. That was 3 years ago. The decline since then could signal market consolidation, saturation, or attention shifting to adjacent categories.
Average engagement per product dropped from 0.27 in 2022 to 0.17 in 2026. More products competing for the same attention pool. The community is spread thinner, which makes high-engagement launches more impressive.
The highest-performing quarter was Q4 2024, with an average interest score of 482 across 8 launches. Boost.space 4.0 led that quarter.
We report what happened. We don't predict. Five years of data shows patterns, but markets surprise people for a living.
Three common reasons. The market consolidated around winners. The technology matured and stopped generating new startups. Or builder attention shifted to adjacent categories. Usually it's a combination.
Volume without engagement is saturation. Engagement without volume is opportunity. Check which one you're looking at.
Sum of all interest scores in the quarter divided by number of products. Simple average. We don't weight by category or product age.
Depends on what's declining. If volume drops but engagement rises, the market is maturing. That's often good for existing players. If both drop, the category may be dying. The quarterly breakdown on each page tells you which pattern you're seeing.
At least three. Two data points is a line, not a trend. We have five years of data for most categories, which is enough to distinguish real shifts from noise.
Current year launches compared to the same period last year. Positive means more products launching. Negative means the category cooled. Neither is inherently good or bad. A mature category with fewer but better launches is often healthier than one flooding the market with clones.