Here's the full Legal market picture. 159 launches indexed, broken down by year, quarter, and engagement metrics. Use this to understand where the category has been and where it's heading.
Five years of Legal launch data. Volume, engagement, and the products that stood out.
Here's the full Legal market picture. 159 launches indexed, broken down by year, quarter, and engagement metrics. Use this to understand where the category has been and where it's heading.
| Quarter | Launches | Avg Interest Score | Top Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2026 | 7 | 73 | Termsy |
| Q2 2026 | 1 | 95 | Gerri |
| Q1 2025 | 15 | 91 | Redactable |
| Q2 2025 | 10 | 85 | Cipherwill |
| Q3 2025 | 4 | 210 | Skala |
| Q4 2025 | 7 | 40 | Praxim for Word |
| Q1 2024 | 11 | 182 | AI Lawyer 2.0 |
| Q2 2024 | 11 | 293 | fynk |
| Q3 2024 | 5 | 199 | Tome |
| Q4 2024 | 6 | 197 | GitLaw |
| Q1 2023 | 7 | 116 | DetangleAI |
| Q2 2023 | 7 | 131 | BetterLegal Assistant |
| Q3 2023 | 16 | 110 | Sandworm Cloud Edition |
| Q4 2023 | 19 | 156 | Genie AI |
| Q1 2022 | 7 | 146 | doola DAOs |
| Q2 2022 | 2 | 155 | DAO Legal Wrapper |
The Legal category has been steady over the past 6 years of tracked data. Total launches went from 13 in 2021 to 8 in 2026.
Average engagement ratio across all Legal launches: 0.32. Products above that line tend to solve a specific, painful problem. Products below it often entered a crowded space without clear differentiation.
Legal peaked in 2023 with 49 launches. That was 3 years ago. The decline since then could signal market consolidation, saturation, or attention shifting to adjacent categories.
Average engagement per product has held steady around 0.32 across the full dataset. The audience for Legal tools is consistent. Engagement doesn't rise or fall with volume, which suggests a stable base of interested users.
The highest-performing quarter was Q2 2024, with an average interest score of 293 across 11 launches. fynk led that quarter.
128 B2B launches (80%) vs 31 B2C (20%) across the full Legal dataset. Legal leans B2B, but a meaningful share of products target individual users.
2021: 13 launches. Average interest: 131. Average engagement: 0.19. Top launch: Founder's Pie (316 interest).
2022: 20 launches (+54% vs 2021). Average interest: 133. Average engagement: 0.29. Top launch: doola DAOs (300 interest).
2023: 49 launches (+145% vs 2022). Average interest: 132. Average engagement: 0.22. Top launch: Genie AI (453 interest).
2024: 33 launches (-33% vs 2023). Average interest: 224. Average engagement: 0.23. Top launch: fynk (947 interest).
2025: 36 launches (+9% vs 2024). Average interest: 93. Average engagement: 0.63. Top launch: Skala (797 interest).
2026: 8 launches (-78% vs 2025). Average interest: 76. Average engagement: 0.21. Top launch: Termsy (188 interest).
Current year launches compared to the same period last year. Positive means more products launching. Negative means the category cooled. Neither is inherently good or bad. A mature category with fewer but better launches is often healthier than one flooding the market with clones.
Launch volume drops but engagement per product rises. Fewer builders entering, but the ones that do find a more receptive audience. That's an opportunity signal. We flag it when we see it.
We report what happened. We don't predict. Five years of data shows patterns, but markets surprise people for a living.
Three common reasons. The market consolidated around winners. The technology matured and stopped generating new startups. Or builder attention shifted to adjacent categories. Usually it's a combination.
Volume without engagement is saturation. Engagement without volume is opportunity. Check which one you're looking at.
Sum of all interest scores in the quarter divided by number of products. Simple average. We don't weight by category or product age.
Depends on what's declining. If volume drops but engagement rises, the market is maturing. That's often good for existing players. If both drop, the category may be dying. The quarterly breakdown on each page tells you which pattern you're seeing.