133 Vibe coding products tracked since 2021. The engagement data is more interesting than the volume data. Categories where engagement rises while volume drops are the ones with the most opportunity.
Five years of Vibe coding launch data. Volume, engagement, and the products that stood out.
133 Vibe coding products tracked since 2021. The engagement data is more interesting than the volume data. Categories where engagement rises while volume drops are the ones with the most opportunity.
| Quarter | Launches | Avg Interest Score | Top Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2026 | 50 | 212 | Rork Max |
| Q2 2026 | 3 | 104 | Straude |
| Q1 2025 | 1 | 1,337 | MGX (Now Atoms) |
| Q3 2025 | 30 | 218 | Anything |
| Q4 2025 | 49 | 162 | v0 for iOS |
Limited year-over-year data for Vibe coding. The category is tracked, but pattern analysis requires at least three years of launches.
116 B2B launches (87%) vs 17 B2C (13%) across the full Vibe coding dataset. Vibe coding is heavily B2B. The products here target teams, companies, and professional workflows.
Three common reasons. The market consolidated around winners. The technology matured and stopped generating new startups. Or builder attention shifted to adjacent categories. Usually it's a combination.
Volume without engagement is saturation. Engagement without volume is opportunity. Check which one you're looking at.
Sum of all interest scores in the quarter divided by number of products. Simple average. We don't weight by category or product age.
Depends on what's declining. If volume drops but engagement rises, the market is maturing. That's often good for existing players. If both drop, the category may be dying. The quarterly breakdown on each page tells you which pattern you're seeing.
At least three. Two data points is a line, not a trend. We have five years of data for most categories, which is enough to distinguish real shifts from noise.
Current year launches compared to the same period last year. Positive means more products launching. Negative means the category cooled. Neither is inherently good or bad. A mature category with fewer but better launches is often healthier than one flooding the market with clones.
Launch volume drops but engagement per product rises. Fewer builders entering, but the ones that do find a more receptive audience. That's an opportunity signal. We flag it when we see it.