The Video Streaming market doesn't publish quarterly earnings. But five years of launch data paints a comparable picture. 118 products, engagement trends, and the names that rose above the noise.
Five years of Video Streaming launch data. Volume, engagement, and the products that stood out.
The Video Streaming market doesn't publish quarterly earnings. But five years of launch data paints a comparable picture. 118 products, engagement trends, and the names that rose above the noise.
| Quarter | Launches | Avg Interest Score | Top Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2026 | 2 | 99 | DubStream by CAMB.AI |
| Q1 2025 | 7 | 140 | Beyond Presence: Video Agent Platform |
| Q2 2025 | 5 | 78 | TL;DR |
| Q3 2025 | 5 | 91 | Ahey |
| Q4 2025 | 3 | 101 | LightBuddy |
| Q1 2024 | 6 | 73 | Reaction Free |
| Q2 2024 | 2 | 133 | Parfour |
| Q3 2024 | 10 | 189 | Conversational Replicas by Tavus |
| Q4 2024 | 1 | 20 | Tokin.tv |
| Q1 2023 | 8 | 201 | Live Video Calling SDK by Dyte |
| Q2 2023 | 6 | 93 | Streams 1.0 |
| Q3 2023 | 11 | 105 | Audience Reacts |
| Q4 2023 | 7 | 101 | DoCast 2.0 |
| Q1 2022 | 15 | 166 | Neverinstall 2.0 |
| Q2 2022 | 10 | 226 | Switchboard |
| Q3 2022 | 5 | 255 | SpatialChat 3.0 |
The Video Streaming category has been cooling over the past 6 years of tracked data. Total launches went from 6 in 2021 to 2 in 2026.
Average engagement ratio across all Video Streaming launches: 0.29. Products above that line tend to solve a specific, painful problem. Products below it often entered a crowded space without clear differentiation.
Video Streaming peaked in 2022 with 39 launches. That was 4 years ago. The decline since then could signal market consolidation, saturation, or attention shifting to adjacent categories.
Average engagement per product has risen from 0.12 in 2021 to 0.29 in 2026. That upward trend means the community is spending more time with each new launch. Either the products are getting better, or the audience is getting more selective. Probably both.
The highest-performing quarter was Q3 2022, with an average interest score of 255 across 5 launches. SpatialChat 3.0 led that quarter.
We report what happened. We don't predict. Five years of data shows patterns, but markets surprise people for a living.
Three common reasons. The market consolidated around winners. The technology matured and stopped generating new startups. Or builder attention shifted to adjacent categories. Usually it's a combination.
Volume without engagement is saturation. Engagement without volume is opportunity. Check which one you're looking at.
Sum of all interest scores in the quarter divided by number of products. Simple average. We don't weight by category or product age.
Depends on what's declining. If volume drops but engagement rises, the market is maturing. That's often good for existing players. If both drop, the category may be dying. The quarterly breakdown on each page tells you which pattern you're seeing.
At least three. Two data points is a line, not a trend. We have five years of data for most categories, which is enough to distinguish real shifts from noise.
Current year launches compared to the same period last year. Positive means more products launching. Negative means the category cooled. Neither is inherently good or bad. A mature category with fewer but better launches is often healthier than one flooding the market with clones.