Pay money, get a private back-channel reference. Apply to give a private reference, get paid once your background is approved. Learn more at: https://www.backchannel.reviews/about
Get verified references for your next hires or collaborators
Pay money, get a private back-channel reference. Apply to give a private reference, get paid once your background is approved. Learn more at: https://www.backchannel.reviews/about
Here's an experiment we're running: Backchannel references as a service → Pay money, get a reference. → Give a reference, get paid (as long as your reference is desired) (If you're seeking a reference, you only pay if we find you someone you want to talk to.) The first experimental product that solves this problem: https://twitter.com/eriktorenber... Open to feedback!
The bounty model is clever. I'm curious if people are willing to pay enough for references, especially if they expect to be able to reach references for free by searching LinkedIn, Twitter, etc. I suppose it depends on who you're targeting – growth stage investors, PE firms, hedge funds, etc. pay a ton of money for AlphaSights, GLG, Tegus, etc.
Great product congratulations 🎉
Congratulations on the launch. How do you address the issue of incentives regarding money? Are reviews for money involved? A review system? Is there already feedback?
Strategy idea: offer this up for both sides on LinkedIn
Categories come from the product's launch tags. Most products appear in 2-3 categories. The primary category is listed first.
The scores reflect launch-period engagement. Historical data is preserved and doesn't change retroactively. The build date at the bottom shows when the index was last refreshed.
Check the similar products section on this page, or browse the category pages linked in the tags above. Each category page shows all products for a given year, sorted by engagement.
A measure of community engagement at launch. Higher means more people noticed and interacted with the product. It's a traction signal, not a quality rating.