AI-powered design reviews from 10 expert panelists
Gleam gives your design a structured review from 10 AI panelists, each with their own specialty—UX, visual design, accessibility, product strategy, and more. Upload a screenshot and get scores, directional insights, and a short list of high-impact fixes to guide your next iteration.
Hey everyone — Dane here 👋 I built Gleam because I’ve always loved iterating on designs, but getting meaningful critique on demand is hard. Sometimes you need quick input across a wide range of topics to break out of your current focus and see your design more broadly. Gleam gives you that: 10 AI reviewers with different specialties, scoring your design and pointing you toward the highest-leverage improvements. Not a replacement for real design expertise — just a tool to help you think about tra
Oh wow this looks soo good! My design team is not gonna have a fun day I am sure of it haha.
This is a massive unlock for solo devs. I usually stare at my own designs until I lose all objectivity.
I love this! No more staring at your design, squinting while tilting your head left and right like it could magically fix it. Just drop a screenshot in Gleam and iterate. I'm a fan!
Interesting idea! I suggest a project development option: you upload a link to your project and it generates a series of audits—layout quality, SEO quality, design quality, etc. But full audits, with a report and recommendations. On the website, immediately show examples of such audits so the quality level is clear. I haven’t seen a project like this, but I’m sure it would be in demand. And Google queries for audits aren’t very competitive, so getting into the top 5 and receiving organic traffic
The scores reflect launch-period engagement. Historical data is preserved and doesn't change retroactively. The build date at the bottom shows when the index was last refreshed.
Check the similar products section on this page, or browse the category pages linked in the tags above. Each category page shows all products for a given year, sorted by engagement.
A measure of community engagement at launch. Higher means more people noticed and interacted with the product. It's a traction signal, not a quality rating.
Discussion threads divided by interest score. Above 0.30 is strong. Below 0.15 suggests the product got clicks but not conversation.