Here's the honest comparison between Butter and Thursday. Community engagement data, category positioning, and the numbers that each product earned at launch.
Side-by-side comparison of Butter and Thursday based on community engagement data.
All-in-one tool for the smoothest virtual workshops 🧈
Where remote teams do their socials, no sign up required
Here's the honest comparison between Butter and Thursday. Community engagement data, category positioning, and the numbers that each product earned at launch.
| Category | Butter | Thursday |
|---|---|---|
| Games | - | Yes |
| Meetings | Yes | - |
| Productivity | Yes | - |
| Remote Work | - | Yes |
| Streaming Services | Yes | - |
| Web App | Yes | Yes |
Finally, being able to try the app in our meetup. Here are some thoughts. + avoid switching from calling app and miro + nice onboarding + smooth and abundant shortcuts - too small speak view, - not ideal for small screen - queue and posing question is a bit confusing - shortcut is overlapped with mi...
Awesome product! I wonder if could integrate Akkadu Multilingual SDK (rsi.akkadu.com) allowing users to host multilingual meetings with AI Translated Subtitles or Professional Interpreters
?makers do you guys plan on making a dark mode theme soon?
Great work! Quick and hassle-free way to have some fun with your team :)
Oh wow! *_* I have just discovered this tool, and I am so happy for finding it! *_* This is absolutely great! The features are amazing! Everything is so nicely explained, and the interface is so clear, pleasant, and intuitive! Also, I must say that it is so nice, so creative, and kind that you have ...
Wow, looks inspiring! I believe this could make our meetings a bit more alive and engaging.
Butter leads on raw interest score. Butter leads on engagement ratio. Butter leads on both metrics. That doesn't happen often.
These products share 1 categories: Web App. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Butter is also tagged in Meetings, Productivity, Streaming Services, which Thursday isn't. That suggests Butter positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Thursday has unique category tags in Games, Remote Work. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Butter launched Apr 2021. Thursday launched Oct 2021. Both launched the same year, meaning they faced similar market conditions and competition levels.
Butter has a 0.55 engagement ratio (exceptionally high), based on 452 discussion threads across 820 interest points. That ratio puts it in the top tier for Web App products. People who noticed it had opinions about it.
Thursday has a 0.47 engagement ratio (exceptionally high), based on 384 discussions across 811 interest points. Strong engagement suggests an audience that tested the product and came back to talk about it.
Within the Web App category (1,235 total products), Butter ranks #7 and Thursday ranks #8 by interest score. Butter sits in the top 10 for the category.
Butter is in the top 1% of Web App by interest. Thursday is in the top 1%.
Pick Butter if you want the product with the larger community behind it; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you need something that also covers Meetings.
Pick Thursday if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; you need something that also covers Remote Work.
Butter: Put your energy back into having delightful and collaborative sessions all from one place with Butter. 🧈😻 Comes with next-level breakouts, agenda, polls, Miro & Google Drive, fun reactions, sounds, and more! Book a demo here: http://btr.to/Orientation 🎉
Thursday: Thursday is where remote teams do their socials. It is a place to hang out with your team and play games in small groups. No sign up required. Nothing to install. Free to use.
These products also compete in the Web App category:
Solid — AI that builds real web apps (Interest: 644, Engagement: 0.25)
Riverside.fm 2.0 — Create stunning podcasts and videos in seconds (Interest: 514, Engagement: 0.27)
MakerLead — Find top 100 open startups with verified monthly revenue (Interest: 435, Engagement: 0.27)
WeWeb 2.0 — The only no-code frontend builder that is backend agnostic (Interest: 406, Engagement: 0.57)
Webflow App Gen — Build full-stack web apps natively in Webflow with AI (Interest: 387, Engagement: 0.10)
Nook Calendar — Own your time, reclaim your attention (Interest: 307, Engagement: 0.47)
Automatically. We compare products that share at least one category and have similar interest scores. Products too far apart in traction don't make for useful comparisons.
No. Interest is launch-day attention. Engagement ratio is a better quality signal. The product with more discussions per interest point usually has stronger product-market fit.
How directly these products compete. Three or more shared categories means they're going after the same user. One shared category means they approach the space from different angles. Zero overlap and they probably shouldn't be compared.
Comparisons are generated automatically when two products have enough data overlap. If the pair you want isn't here, the products might be in different categories or too far apart in engagement.
Either the product didn't meet our engagement threshold, or it doesn't share enough category tags with the other product to generate a meaningful comparison. We'd rather show no comparison than a misleading one.
Each product's data reflects its launch period. The comparison shows both products' engagement metrics from when they launched. The build date at the bottom of the page shows when the index was last refreshed.