Comparing Making Today to Vimcal means looking past marketing into data. Both target Calendar users. Their community reception tells different stories.
Side-by-side comparison of Making Today and Vimcal based on community engagement data.
Your all-in-one dashboard: organize, plan & do
Superhuman for Calendar
Comparing Making Today to Vimcal means looking past marketing into data. Both target Calendar users. Their community reception tells different stories.
| Category | Making Today | Vimcal |
|---|---|---|
| Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Productivity | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Work | - | Yes |
| Task Management | Yes | - |
Tab fatigue is real. Constantly switching between email, calendar, project management tools, pull requests, CI/CD pipelines, task lists, design files, notes, and team chat apps just to stay on top of everything—all while trying to focus on the actual work we're meant to be doing. It often feels like...
Alhamdulillah!!! Excellent product. Aside from the hassle-free tab switching, the best thing I found was the drag-and-drop function and the ability to see everything related to your work at a glance. It's like having a satellite view of your project with a remote controller in your hand. Congratulat...
Looks dope! Chrome extension doesn't seem to work on Arc browser though
@john_li3 - Looks incredible and the description of "Superhuman for Calendar" looks like a good one. I think both would be very useful together. Superhuman has a nonprofit discount - does Vimcal have one as well? Asking (obviously) as an accidental IT person working with a nonprofit budget. 🙂. Looks...
Been looking for such products fr months! Hopefully I made it on time for the access today :)
Congrats on the launch! Love the clean interaction design :)
Making Today leads on raw interest score. Vimcal leads on engagement ratio. That split is worth paying attention to. Making Today attracted more initial eyeballs, but Vimcal's audience engaged deeper. For most buyers, engagement ratio is the better signal.
These products share 2 categories: Calendar, Productivity. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Making Today is also tagged in Task Management, which Vimcal isn't. That suggests Making Today positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Vimcal has unique category tags in Remote Work. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Making Today launched Aug 2024. Vimcal launched Oct 2021. Vimcal is the veteran here. Making Today entered later, with the benefit of watching what worked and what didn't in the category.
Pick Making Today if you want the product with the larger community behind it; you prefer newer tools with fresher tech; you need something that also covers Task Management.
Pick Vimcal if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you value stability and a longer track record; you need something that also covers Remote Work.
Making Today: Making Today combines your apps and notifications into one dashboard, making it easy to stay organized. Manage meetings, todos, pull requests, jira/linear tickets, notes, bookmarks and more—all without switching tabs.
Vimcal: Vimcal is the world’s fastest calendar, beautifully designed for people who work remotely and live in their calendars. It comes fully-featured with timezone conversion, booking links, keyboard shortcuts, and everything else a modern calendar app should have.
These products also compete in the Calendar, Productivity categories:
Orchestra — A chat-centric workspace for builders and modern teams (Interest: 803, Engagement: 0.27)
Supabase AI Assistant [LW24] — Idea to Postgres database (Interest: 759, Engagement: 0.13)
Blobr — Get your branded API portal in minutes (Interest: 371, Engagement: 0.34)
Cohere Chime — Let customers call you with one click and zero setup. (Interest: 369, Engagement: 0.21)
V7 Go — Automate multi modal tasks using GenAI, reliably, at scale (Interest: 351, Engagement: 0.16)
Hexofy — Capture data from any page, like magic (Interest: 311, Engagement: 0.32)
Not yet. Current comparisons use launch-period data only. Post-launch tracking is on our roadmap.
Generally, yes. Engagement ratio is hard to fake. A product can generate artificial interest, but sustained discussion threads require people who actually used the product and had something to say about it.
Automatically. We compare products that share at least one category and have similar interest scores. Products too far apart in traction don't make for useful comparisons.
No. Interest is launch-day attention. Engagement ratio is a better quality signal. The product with more discussions per interest point usually has stronger product-market fit.
How directly these products compete. Three or more shared categories means they're going after the same user. One shared category means they approach the space from different angles. Zero overlap and they probably shouldn't be compared.
Comparisons are generated automatically when two products have enough data overlap. If the pair you want isn't here, the products might be in different categories or too far apart in engagement.