thirdweb and Creem 1.0 compete for similar users in Crypto. One pulled more initial interest. The other generated deeper discussions. Which metric matters more depends on what you're optimizing for.
Side-by-side comparison of thirdweb and Creem 1.0 based on community engagement data.
Build web3 apps and games, easily
Split SaaS revenue with partners, sell without headaches
thirdweb and Creem 1.0 compete for similar users in Crypto. One pulled more initial interest. The other generated deeper discussions. Which metric matters more depends on what you're optimizing for.
| Category | thirdweb | Creem 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| API | Yes | - |
| Crypto | Yes | Yes |
| Developer Tools | Yes | - |
| Fintech | - | Yes |
| Payments | - | Yes |
| Tech | Yes | - |
| Web3 | Yes | - |
Product does attempt to fill the niche in the market. I do hope that UX will get a bit more native, but appart from that the product is 5/5. Considering future development possibilities
@furqanr this is insanely cool! I just messaged you on Twitter and was wondering....where do your customers host their new Web3 apps and games? Is there a Web3 storage partner you're using?
Hey there, my website is fandomers.com and I'm trying to create a NFT marketplace for all users ( artists, fans from fandoms ...) but I just failed. Any tips?
Hey Product Hunt 👋 I’m Gabriel, co-founder of Creem. Today we’re launching Creem 1.0 — and this one feels special. Why we started Creem As SaaS founders, we kept losing time and money dealing with: Payments in different markets Sales tax and compliance Global payouts Instead of building our product,...
Looks really really cool! What's the differentiation from Lemon Squeezy?
@sudoferraz thanks for laughing
thirdweb leads on raw interest score. thirdweb leads on engagement ratio. thirdweb leads on both metrics. That doesn't happen often.
These products share 1 categories: Crypto. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
thirdweb is also tagged in API, Developer Tools, Web3, which Creem 1.0 isn't. That suggests thirdweb positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Creem 1.0 has unique category tags in Fintech, Payments. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
thirdweb launched Dec 2021. Creem 1.0 launched Aug 2025. thirdweb has had more time to iterate and build a user base. Creem 1.0 had the advantage of launching into a more defined market with clearer user expectations.
thirdweb has a 0.56 engagement ratio (exceptionally high), based on 500 discussion threads across 892 interest points. That ratio puts it in the top tier for Crypto products. People who noticed it had opinions about it.
Creem 1.0 has a 0.25 engagement ratio (average), based on 178 discussions across 706 interest points. Average engagement for the category. Solid but not exceptional.
The 0.31 gap in engagement ratio is significant. thirdweb generated substantially deeper community discussion per interest point.
Within the Crypto category (479 total products), thirdweb ranks #2 and Creem 1.0 ranks #3 by interest score. thirdweb sits in the top 10 for the category.
thirdweb is in the top 0% of Crypto by interest. Creem 1.0 is in the top 1%.
Pick thirdweb if you want the product with the larger community behind it; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you value stability and a longer track record; you need something that also covers API.
Pick Creem 1.0 if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; you prefer newer tools with fresher tech; you need something that also covers Payments.
thirdweb: ⛏️ **Build** features such as NFT's, marketplaces, tokens, and more in a few clicks 🧰 **Utility** SDK's, widgets, and interfaces to integrate web3 features into your app 🕹️ **Powers** blockchain games, DAO's, NFT card platforms, generative art drops and more
Creem 1.0: Smooth payments for SaaS 🤝 Split revenue with partners anywhere. 🌍 Get paid in 80+ currencies, 100+ countries & stablecoins. 🤖 AI assistant that knows your business data. 💳 Sell with subscriptions & one-time payments without Tax headaches.
These products also compete in the Crypto category:
Clustr — The reality check for your crypto portfolio (Interest: 1,514, Engagement: 0.41)
Minara — Research, plan, and invest in one chat (Interest: 481, Engagement: 0.38)
Tordess — Empowering talented crypto traders globally (Interest: 388, Engagement: 0.21)
Bueno — No-Code Tools for NFT Creators (Interest: 335, Engagement: 0.16)
Via Protocol — All cross‑chain bridges and DEXs in one UI (Interest: 325, Engagement: 6.87)
Metafi Wallet SDK — Embed a crypto wallet within your game in seconds (Interest: 315, Engagement: 0.81)
Generally, yes. Engagement ratio is hard to fake. A product can generate artificial interest, but sustained discussion threads require people who actually used the product and had something to say about it.
Automatically. We compare products that share at least one category and have similar interest scores. Products too far apart in traction don't make for useful comparisons.
No. Interest is launch-day attention. Engagement ratio is a better quality signal. The product with more discussions per interest point usually has stronger product-market fit.
How directly these products compete. Three or more shared categories means they're going after the same user. One shared category means they approach the space from different angles. Zero overlap and they probably shouldn't be compared.
Comparisons are generated automatically when two products have enough data overlap. If the pair you want isn't here, the products might be in different categories or too far apart in engagement.
Either the product didn't meet our engagement threshold, or it doesn't share enough category tags with the other product to generate a meaningful comparison. We'd rather show no comparison than a misleading one.