Gamma and Raycast Notes share the Writing category. That's where the similarities start. The engagement data below shows where they diverge.
Side-by-side comparison of Gamma and Raycast Notes based on community engagement data.
Write like a doc, present like a deck
Fast, light, and frictionless note-taking
Gamma and Raycast Notes share the Writing category. That's where the similarities start. The engagement data below shows where they diverge.
| Category | Gamma | Raycast Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Mac | - | Yes |
| Productivity | Yes | Yes |
| Tech | Yes | - |
| Writing | Yes | Yes |
@clickonealexi1 Thank You Alexi, that means so much to me. Love You too.
Wow we actually pitched Maven to investors solely using an investor memo / document, but we got a few asks for a deck so I wonder if we could just use this next time! Excited to try it out next time we need to build a presentation...
Finally, someone has truly reimagined how we do slide decks. This literally saved me 3 hours of work on my first day of classes.
Hi all! Nichlas from Raycast here 👋 We’re really excited to finally present our latest feature, Raycast Notes! We believe it’s a significant improvement over our previous Floating Notes, from which we received so much valuable feedback from all of you 🙏 This project has been super fun and challengin...
I'm big fan of raycast, and this feature is really cool to have notes on place. thanks for the update!
For anyone who hasn't already tried @Raycast , the Raycast Notes experience is almost reason enough. The markdown support is excellent. It's essentially like having your favorite markdown note taking app always a shortcut away. Fantastic job guys.
Gamma leads on raw interest score. Gamma leads on engagement ratio. Gamma leads on both metrics. That doesn't happen often.
These products share 2 categories: Productivity, Writing. Moderate overlap suggests they target related but distinct use cases.
Gamma is also tagged in Tech, which Raycast Notes isn't. That suggests Gamma positions itself more broadly or targets an adjacent audience.
Raycast Notes has unique category tags in Mac. Different positioning can mean a different buyer profile, even within the same space.
Gamma launched Aug 2022. Raycast Notes launched Nov 2024. Gamma has had more time to iterate and build a user base. Raycast Notes had the advantage of launching into a more defined market with clearer user expectations.
Gamma has a 0.39 engagement ratio (strong), based on 438 discussion threads across 1,121 interest points. That ratio puts it in the top tier for Writing products. People who noticed it had opinions about it.
Raycast Notes has a 0.09 engagement ratio (below average), based on 93 discussions across 1,077 interest points. The low ratio suggests a launch that got attention but didn't convert that attention into sustained interest.
The 0.30 gap in engagement ratio is significant. Gamma generated substantially deeper community discussion per interest point.
Within the Productivity category (10,876 total products), Gamma ranks #32 and Raycast Notes ranks #35 by interest score. Both are in the upper tier of Productivity launches.
Gamma is in the top 0% of Productivity by interest. Raycast Notes is in the top 0%.
Pick Gamma if you want the product with the larger community behind it; sustained discussion and active users are your priority; you value stability and a longer track record; you need something that also covers Tech.
Pick Raycast Notes if community size matters less to you than engagement depth; you prefer newer tools with fresher tech; you need something that also covers Mac.
Gamma: Gamma is an alternative to slide decks - a fast, simple way to share and present your work. Create engaging presentations, memos, briefs, and docs that are easy to discuss live or share async. All in your browser, nothing to download or install.
Raycast Notes: Raycast Notes makes it frictionless to organize your thoughts from anywhere on your Mac. Track todos, save meeting notes, and collect ideas. Designed to be lightweight with Markdown support and just a keystroke away.
These products also compete in the Productivity, Writing categories:
Cap — Beautiful screen recordings, owned by you. 100% open source. (Interest: 1,064, Engagement: 0.08)
Internet Is Beautiful — Discover the most interesting, weird and awesome websites (Interest: 544, Engagement: 0.17)
Podsqueeze — Re-purpose your podcast content using AI (Interest: 538, Engagement: 0.28)
CoPilot.Live — Your personalised AI assistant (Interest: 408, Engagement: 0.49)
Outlit — AI agents for your SaaS deals (Interest: 373, Engagement: 0.23)
Slashit App — Turn your common text into shortcuts and work faster with AI (Interest: 327, Engagement: 0.23)
Not yet. Current comparisons use launch-period data only. Post-launch tracking is on our roadmap.
Generally, yes. Engagement ratio is hard to fake. A product can generate artificial interest, but sustained discussion threads require people who actually used the product and had something to say about it.
Automatically. We compare products that share at least one category and have similar interest scores. Products too far apart in traction don't make for useful comparisons.
No. Interest is launch-day attention. Engagement ratio is a better quality signal. The product with more discussions per interest point usually has stronger product-market fit.
How directly these products compete. Three or more shared categories means they're going after the same user. One shared category means they approach the space from different angles. Zero overlap and they probably shouldn't be compared.
Comparisons are generated automatically when two products have enough data overlap. If the pair you want isn't here, the products might be in different categories or too far apart in engagement.